Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1472

reference
908-tree-1
name
1472
tree-preservation-order

undefined

908-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046070 50.866857)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045957 50.866845,-1.045962 50.866867,-1.045978 50.866887,-1.046003 50.866903,-1.046034 50.866914,-1.046069 50.866918,-1.046104 50.866914,-1.046136 50.866904,-1.046162 50.866889,-1.046178 50.866869,-1.046184 50.866847,-1.046179 50.866824,-1.046164 50.866804,-1.046139 50.866788,-1.046107 50.866778,-1.046072 50.866774,-1.046037 50.866777,-1.046005 50.866787,-1.045980 50.866803,-1.045963 50.866823,-1.045957 50.866845)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL